|
Results
Original question:
Whether you voted for a division of powers or for a single Panel,(option A or B)
Do you also want to elect a 3 person Executive? (President, Secretary, Treasurer)
Please use the comment line for any other options that you might want.
YES? NO? Other
Electing an Executive
Total number of voters: 84
| Vote |
Number of Votes |
Percentage |
| I want something else |
9 |
10.7143% |
| NO |
13 |
15.4762% |
| YES |
62 |
73.8095% |
Comments:
- first we need bylaws which will determine this answer
- What I want is four officers (as above plus a Vice-president) with the usual responsibilities. However, in ICANNATLARGE.ORG, it is the Panel which functions as the executive, not a 3-person subgroup, and that's how I'd like it to stay.
- Maybe 3 people are too many for restricted groups with focused missions
- There should be one elected executive; all other executive power should derive from him/her, with perhaps a confirmation process involving either the membership or a panel. (I have in mind something like the U.S. Cabinet.)
- The board may elect its pres, sec, and treas on a quarter based or something
- I detest that word "executive". I only want to elect "administrators" who obey the instructions of the membership.
- The committee should elect its leaders
- and what is their level of responsibility for the Governance of the organization?
- None of the governmental alternatives need an executive branch.
- The first question was vague. "B" implied a single officer with a particular mandate. Rather, I would like a set of committees of 3-5 members with an overarching executive somewhat larger.
- We've just dumped an informal structure where some folks fancied themselves as executives. Let's not replace them with even more hierarchy.
- I would prefer to elect a president, and allow the president power of appointment.
- the panel can designate
Last update 14 April, 2003. Questions, proposals or feedback about the website can be directed to the webmaster.
|
