|
Results
Original question:
If you voted for B.(division of Powers) do you want to elect a website supervisory Panel of 3, 5, 7, 9, or 11 persons?
Web site Panel size
Total number of voters: 73
| Vote |
Number of Votes |
Percentage |
| 11 |
18 |
24.6575% |
| 3 |
14 |
19.1781% |
| 5 |
26 |
35.6164% |
| 7 |
12 |
16.4384% |
| 9 |
3 |
4.1096% |
Comments:
- I don't think we need more commitees to organize 1000 people
- 3 is clearly too small; 5 would be acceptable; more than 7 risks unwieldiness.
- Too big = too much talking
- ICANNATLARGE.ORG needs a new Interim Panel, not a "Website supervisory Panel" as shown. Once proper mechanisms are in place for decision-making by members and administration by the Panel, our Web Working Group of volunteers can take care of the site.
- Given the strong views that many members have with respect to web development, to ensure effectiveness of this panel, a simply majority is all that should be required for decision making.
- sufficient for the task
- All these matters that have been put to a vote can always be changed/fine-tuned later on when its apparent they're working or not working. The number or nature can always be changed later on.
Last update 14 April, 2003. Questions, proposals or feedback about the website can be directed to the webmaster.
|
