Results

Original question:

These questions were raised by Jefsey Morfin on the icannatlarge discussion list.

1 Question 'where' : - there are those who want to be a structural force within ICANN - there are those who want to be a influential force on ICANN from their outside action - there are those who want to build outside of ICANN

2. Question 'what': - there are those who want to build a constituency (IDNH; @large, SMEs) - there are those who want to be a large organization - there are those who want to lobby

The Voting options have been condensed to cover both main questions.

ICANN constituency

Constituency elsewhere

large organization

lobbying force

other

Our Mission options

Total number of voters: 135

Comments:

• Too many cooks are not good, ICANN has been trying to achieve a framework anyway. All should help towards making it effective rather than having small islands and reaching nowhere..
• this question as worded is confusing. last choice does not show in my browser.
• I would have preferred the option "ICANN constituency OR elsewhere in case ICANN is superseded
• This is not a question of choice, but rather a question of priority. The best way is to create an indepedent organization with influence on other orhanizations (ICANN, ITU,...)
• A large org has more options, as it is not in itself single-minded
• Combination of all of the above as needed/appropriate
• is necessary to promote the participation
• IcannatLarge needs to be independent from ICANN, yet not too big (Management problem).
• The question is confusing. What I'd like is a large ICANN-related lobbying force that works
• Grab the Secretariat and run away with it.
• What exactly are we voting on here? The meaning of the options is not clear.
• all the above - need flexibility
• the important point is to build something which makes sense not only inside, but also outside the icann process. even if beeing an icann constituency, that doens´t mean it cannot get ignored in the icann policy making process.

Last update 14 April, 2003. Questions, proposals or feedback about the website can be directed to the webmaster.