Results

Original question:

David Farrar proposed his own phrasing of Judyth's questions:

Do you want the authority of the organisation's Board to be:

a) Can decide nothing - only authority is to refer issues for members votes

b) Can decide everything, including changes to the bylaws/constitution (ICANN model)

c) Can decide everything except bylaws changes

d) Members decide on bylaws and policies but board decides on all other issues but with right of veto by members if say 5% object

A B C D

Direct Democracy or Board Authority?

Total number of voters: 106

• D is nearest to my view. Basically I think ANY member should be able to initiate a vote through this Booth. I would prefer to re-word (D) to say: board decides on SOME other issues... and: "if a majority at the Booth votes against"
• Option d should not have a specific percentage - especially not one so low.
• I preferred D, but 5% is too low. Operating an effective organization is not an easy task. It must be responsive to members, but the board should not have to deal with a small minority determined to obstruct its work. 10-15% is better.
• option d provides effeciency and rapid action, but allows a check of consensus.
• IMO
• This list of options does not really cover a functioning direct democracy, but D comes closest.
• I feel that it would be best if the board tabled the topics, and any major desicions be voted on by the members, thus giving a true reflection of the intent of the majority.
• Boards need to be accountable to the membership, but they also need to have the ability to exercise their own judgement. However, they should not be able to hijack an org. via bylaws changes ala ICANN.
• Right to veto by general membership should have higher proportional requirements, like 20% or 25% instead of just 5%
• non of the above - let members elect board then let board run the show
• veto by members if say 15% object
• I like option D - it allows elected administrators to take decisions... but under close supervision!
• I believe exceptions to "C." must be recognized as the Board may decide that a general vote is appropriate if they feel a certain decision to be highly sensitive and broader participation will better define organizational direction.

Last update 07 May, 2003. Questions, proposals or feedback about the website can be directed to the webmaster.