Results

Original question:

Do you trust the motives behind ICANN's top-down attempts to create their own version of an At Large based on RALOs within their own structures and processes?

YES ______ NO ________ ABSTAIN ________ Discussion please here: http://www.icannatlarge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=821#821

Trusting ICANN's At Large structuring

Total number of voters: 101

• the removal of the established voting mechanism after one election was intolerable. the substitution mechanism is designed to remove power from the at large constituiency.
• it is still within a self governing organazation. This is not benificial to ALL domain owners.
• Everything I've read says that the last thing ICANN wants is truly independent directors that represent grassroots Internet activists.
• That question is meant as a joke, no?
• Partially, but for the most part, 'no'.
• Need Additional Info.
• Rephares: Do you believe that an ICANN's Controlled/Initiated @Large will be effective and beneficial to the Internet Users?
• By definition, any top-down process is intrinsically non-democratic and therefore fatally flawed.
• They mean to insure no popular influence

Last update 07 May, 2003. Questions, proposals or feedback about the website can be directed to the webmaster.